Here’s a bold statement: The Cleveland Browns’ decision to hire Todd Monken as their 19th head coach wasn’t just Jimmy Haslam’s call—it was a unanimous choice by the entire search committee, including GM Andrew Berry. But here’s where it gets controversial: despite rumors that Berry was overruled in favor of Monken over Rams pass coordinator Nate Scheelhaase, league sources reveal that Monken was the ‘strong No. 1 choice’ from the start. So, why did this narrative take hold? And this is the part most people miss: Monken’s hiring wasn’t about sidelining Berry’s preferences but about aligning with the team’s top priority—transforming their offense.
Let’s break it down. While the Browns genuinely admired Scheelhaase, 35, and believe he’s a future head coaching star, Monken, 59, stood out as the clear frontrunner. His deep, eclectic offensive resume and proven success at every stop—from Oklahoma State to the Ravens—made him irresistible. During the interview process, Monken blew away the committee, which included former Chargers and Raiders GM Tom Telesco, who gave Berry his first NFL job. After vetting 23 candidates and narrowing the list to eight external interviewees (plus internal candidates Jim Schwartz and Tommy Rees), Monken remained at the top.
Here’s the kicker: If Monken were a decade younger, he’d likely have been a top target for the 10 teams seeking coaches this cycle. Instead, the Browns were the only team to interview him—a move that could pay dividends if they pair him with a winning quarterback. Even Giants coach John Harbaugh, Monken’s former boss, tried to convince him to join the Giants instead, waiting 24 days to see if Monken would change his mind.
Monken’s appeal isn’t just his offensive genius. He brings a rare blend of old-school discipline, innovative thinking, and player development skills honed over 26 years in college football, including back-to-back national championships with Georgia. His demanding yet relatable style—tough but funny, self-deprecating yet genuine—resonates with players. Remember when Odell Beckham Jr. and Jarvis Landry turned to Monken to mediate quarterback room tensions in 2019? That’s the kind of trust he inspires.
But here’s a thought-provoking question: Can a 59-year-old coach with just one prior head coaching stint (turning around Southern Miss from 0-12 to 9-5 in three years) truly revolutionize the Browns’ offense? Critics might point to his age or limited head coaching experience, but supporters argue his track record speaks for itself. From coaching Jameis Winston to 4,000 yards in Tampa Bay to helping Lamar Jackson win his second NFL MVP in Baltimore, Monken has consistently elevated offenses and players.
The Browns’ vision is clear: pair Monken’s offensive prowess with Schwartz’s defensive mastery, ideally retaining Schwartz as defensive coordinator. Monken’s detail-oriented, collaborative approach—coupled with his embrace of analytics—aligns perfectly with the Browns’ front office philosophy. Already, he’s assembling a strong staff, luring top assistants like George Warhop and Travis Switzer from the Ravens.
One last controversial point: Some argue the Browns should have prioritized a younger, more ‘modern’ coach like Scheelhaase. But Monken’s experience and proven adaptability—from the Air Raid to power running games—make him a safer bet. His career trajectory even mirrors Bruce Arians, who became a Super Bowl-winning head coach in his 60s.
So, was hiring Monken the right call? Only time will tell. But one thing’s certain: the Browns didn’t just hire a coach—they hired a leader who commands respect, inspires players, and has the tools to transform their offense. What do you think? Is Monken the right choice, or should the Browns have gone with a younger option like Scheelhaase? Let’s hear your thoughts in the comments!
